Schedule I & II Regulatory Verification Process - Food. This page is part of the Guidance Document Repository (GDR).
Cfia Prerequisite Program Validation
- Role of Prerequisite Programs.
- Appendix II FSEP Prerequisite Program Checklist Appendix II FSEP Prerequisite Program Checklist Establishment Name
- 2007-04-01 FSEP Manual - Appendix II page 1 Appendix II - FSEP Prerequisite Program Checklist Establishment Name
- FOOD SAFETY PRACTICES GUIDANCE FOR SPROUT MANUFACTURERS FIRST EDITION. Practices Guidance for Sprout Manufacturers.
Looking for related documents? Purpose. The purpose of this document is to describe the process that is implemented by the CFIA to verify that registered fish establishments are complying with the requirements of Schedule I & II of the Fish Inspection Regulations. Scope. This process is part of the regulatory verification of all fish establishments registered under the authority of the Fish Inspection Regulations. Process Description. Conducting the Inspection Task.
This chapter provides the meat standards related to each generic prerequisite program defined in the FSEP manual. This chapter also provides guidance on other. CFIA FSEP - Guideline for Written Program - Download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online. Prerequisite program sub-elements.Appendix VI page 12. Good Manufacturing Practices. The GMP audit covers the Prerequisite Program requirements that are commonly outlined by various regulatory bodies such as CFIA, FDA and.
The following describes the regulatory verification activities as applied to Schedule I & II in registered establishments: a) Compliance Verification (CV)A Schedule I & II inspection is a regulatory verification tool used by an inspector during a Compliance Verification (CV) that includes the establishment's Prerequisite Program Plan in the scope. If non- conformities have been identified in any element assessed, an acceptable Corrective Action Plan (CAP) must be submitted within 3. All deficiencies and system fixes must be addressed within 3. CAP is submitted. CFIA verification of the implementation and effectiveness of the CAP will occur at the next CV.
Level of Compliance of . An acceptable CAP must be submitted within 3. All deficiencies and system fixes must be addressed within 3. CAP is submitted. Upon implementation of the CAP, the establishment must complete a Schedule I & II inspection of their facility and submit a completed Facility Self- Evaluation Report to the CFIA within this 3. An unannounced CFIA verification of the implementation and effectiveness of the CAP may occur after the implementation deadline.
The establishment must provide the CFIA with the Facility Self- Evaluation Report which will indicate that the establishment is able to operate at this level of compliance while it works to correct any outstanding system and/or deficiency problems. An acceptable CAP must then be submitted within 3.
All deficiencies and system fixes must be addressed within 3. CAP is submitted. Upon implementation of the CAP, the establishment must complete a Schedule I & II inspection of their facility and submit a completed Facility Self Evaluation Report to the CFIA within this 3. Unannounced CFIA verification of the implementation and effectiveness of the CAP may occur after the implementation deadline. If the establishment is not able to bring their Schedule II level of compliance to at least a .
If neither of these options is taken, the CFIA will initiate procedures to suspend the certificate of registration. Level of Compliance of .
The establishment will be notified in writing of the unacceptable inspection result with either a completed Facility Inspection Report and/or a Notification of Non Compliance - PDF (1. All processing operations must stop and the processor must conduct a review to determine if the critical non- conformity may have affected product safety. A critical non- conformity would still be issued but the establishment could continue operation as soon as the deficiencies have been corrected and verified by the inspector. The establishment must submit a written CAP within 2. Corrective Action Process Standard. The CV process would then continue as per the regular Corrective Action Process Standard.
An acceptable CAP dealing with any outstanding system and/or deficiency problems must be submitted within 3. Those system and/or deficiency problems must be addressed within 3. CAP is submitted.
Upon implementation of the CAP, the establishment must complete a Schedule I & II inspection of their facility and submit a completed Facility Self- Evaluation Report to the CFIA within this 3. An unannounced CFIA verification of the implementation and effectiveness of the CAP will occur as soon as possible after the implementation deadline. Any time an unacceptable level of compliance is assessed a letter of non- compliance (i. If the establishment was in inactive status, an application for reactivation must also be submitted.
After CFIA verification of the corrective action taken, the establishment will be permitted to resume operations and the CV activities will continue. An acceptable CAP must then be submitted within 3. All deficiencies and system fixes must be addressed with 3.
CAP is submitted. Upon implementation of the CAP, the establishment must complete a Schedule I & II inspection of their facility and submit a completed Facility Self- Evaluation Report to the CFIA within this 3. Unannounced CFIA verification of the implementation and effectiveness of the CAP will occur after the implementation deadline.
If the establishment does not request reactivation within 3. CAP for the identified deficiencies must still be submitted within 3. If these requirements are not met, proceedings to suspend the certificate of registration may be initiated. If the requirements are met, the establishment must request reactivation before registration renewal. The establishment must be at an .
If the establishment is found to not be at an acceptable level of compliance (.